Marijuana Possession Charge amended to Jay Walking


DUI Dismissed after Motion to Suppress Hearing

June 2017

Client stopped for lane violation in Overland Park late at night.  The officer ran client through a series of field sobriety tests, including the alphabet test, counting backwards test, and finger-dexterity test while driver was seated in his car.  Client passed all three tests.  The officer then wanted additional "field sobriety tests", including the walk-and-turn and the one-leg stand tests.  The latter two tests are well recognized in the DUI-investigation field and are always requested during a DUI investigation.  Client showed very minimal clues of impairment on both tests.  The officer then requested the preliminary breath test (PBT), the hand-held device often used at the end of the investigation.  Client refused the PBT and was arrested for suspicion of DUI.  Client provided a breath test at the station, registering just over the legal limit.  We filed a motion to suppress the breath test based on an unlawful arrest since my client passed most, if not all, the field sobriety tests.  The video evidence confirmed my clients good performance on these tests.  Following a hearing, the court ruled that the officer clearly did not have probable cause to arrest my client based on the "totality of the circumstances" review.  A recent Wichita case titled State vs. Molitor  had very similar facts to our case.  In Molitor, the Supreme Court reversed the lower courts ruling that the officer's arrest of Molitor was legal based on a failure to establish probable cause to arrest.  In particular, the battery of tests relied upon were not credible, especially the HGN (horizontal gaze) test.  Since Molitor passed the other field tests, the Preliminary breath test (PBT) should not have been offered.  Simply put, the evidence at the scene did not meet the probable cause standard to arrest Molitor 

We relied on the Molitor ruling to make our case that under similar circumstances, the officer simply did not have probable cause to arrest following my client's excellent field sobriety test results.  The bottom line is to contest each sobriety test and build the case that the PBT test should not have been offered based on the testing leading up to the PBT request.    

Practice area(s): DUI / DWI

Court: Overland Park

Matt McLane

Matt McLane was born in Topeka, Kansas, and moved to Pittsburg, Kansas in 1980 where he attended middle school, high school and college. Upon graduation from PSU in 1992, Matt moved back to Topeka where he attended Washburn University law school. Upon graduation, he moved to Overland Park and worked in a small firm handling DUI and traffic cases. He opened the McLane Law Firm in April 2011 and has built his firm on a strong referral base and solid reputation.

McLane Law Firm

Matt McLane has been defending individuals charged with DUI, traffic and criminal offenses since his graduation from Washburn University Law School in 1996. Licensed in the states of Kansas and Missouri. Mr. McLane specializes in DUI and criminal defense throughout the Kansas City metropolitan area.

Contact Us Today!

Mr. McLane´s clients benefit from his experience and reputation of being a respected, professional attorney with a strong work ethic who is committed to successfully resolving every client´s legal challenges in a Timely and Professional manner.

McLane Law Firm, LLC
(913) 322-4715 (fax)
Mon: 08:30am - 05:30pm
Tue: 08:30am - 05:30pm
Wed: 08:30am - 05:30pm
Thu: 08:30am - 05:30pm
Fri: 08:30am - 05:30pm